2. The judgment of the court below is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, while the court below seems to have determined the punishment in consideration of all the above circumstances, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had been punished twice by the crime of interference with business in 2007, he again committed the crime of this case. In addition, in full view of the circumstances of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, and therefore the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.