국가유공자상이등급결정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 23, 1964, the Plaintiff entered the Army and participated in the Vietnam War from August 30, 1966 to August 30, 1967, and was discharged from military service on October 7, 1967.
B. On March 2, 2016, the Plaintiff rendered an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State to the Vietnam War on the part of the Vietnam War, and deliberated and decided on July 25, 2016 as meeting the requirements of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State.
On January 3, 2017, the plaintiff received a physical examination to determine a disability rating at the Central Veterans Hospital, and the defendant notified the plaintiff that he/she constitutes Class 7 9070 of the disability rating after deliberation and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement.
C. On November 16, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for a re-examination with the Defendant on the ground that the above wounds have deteriorated, and received a re-examination at the Central Veterans Hospital on January 3, 2018.
At the time of physical examination, on the ground that “the plaintiff is recognized to have a high level of functional disorder caused by infections several times due to infections in the mission of the left-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-hand top-down
However, on February 28, 2018, the first Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement opened on February 28, 2018 is two or more previous wounds in accordance with the disability rating table in [Attachment 3] of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State on the ground that it appears that the Plaintiff’s act of re-delivery to the mission, which is a higher-class member of the Plaintiff’s left-hand top, was conducted due to