beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.12 2015고단5933

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 21, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Branch on November 21, 2006, and a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime in the same court on February 11, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 12:20 on August 15, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (ex post facto action) driving a DNA car in the direction of fraud in the direction of the king of the same military interest, driving a DNA car in the direction of fraud, in the direction of the king of the Incheon-do Modeababa, Modemba, Modemba, Modemba, in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.180%.

Since there are automobiles parked on the road as a parking lot, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brake system, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and parked while driving as it was, and the left part of the back part of the FtRa motor vehicle owned by the victim E (the age of 47) was shocked to the right right part of the front part of the FtRa motor vehicle above.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, destroyed the above twit vehicles to cover approximately KRW 670,00,000, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

2. On August 15, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) was driven by blood alcohol concentration of 0.180% on the side of the road of the Incheon Strengthening military forces on August 15, 2015, and was driving the motor vehicle indicated in paragraph (1) in the direction of the electric light from the direction of the beach to the front light.

Since there was a three-distance in which signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant would turn to the left without disregarding the signal and drive the victim G(44 years old).