However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 04:30 on August 25, 2013, at the convenience point of the operation of the victim C (the age of 42) in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) tried the victim by breaking the police before being reported to the police; (b) dumping the victim on the ground that the victim was punished; (c) dumpeded the victim on the ground that the victim reported to the police before being reported to the police; and (d) assaulted the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements (C) and photographs of damage;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and telephone communications;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant criminal facts (Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant has been punished twice as a fine for the same kind of crime, and the defendant has committed violence against the victim on June 21, 2013, in consideration of the fact that the fine of one million won is the one who raised an objection to the crime of this case and the nature of the crime is not good).

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake and that there is no record of punishment heavier than imprisonment without prison labor) is above the suspended sentence;