2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff, a company running the taxi passenger vehicle transport business, concluded a contract for workplace skill development training with the Plaintiff’s employees by means of remote training (hereinafter “instant training” and, in some cases, indicated “first training”, etc. according to the sequence), as indicated below, with the company A or B (hereinafter “C”), which is a company recognized as a worker’s workplace skill development training course, and received a total of KRW 20,784,960, as shown in the table “subsidies” under the premise that the said trainee completed the normal training and completed the training, and that the said trainee satisfied the standards for completing the payment of subsidies for remote training (hereinafter “the subsidies”) (hereinafter “the standards for completing the training”).

On August 21, 2014, the date of concluding a contract for the support for the training entrustment contract (the other party)* the date of payment of training expenses for the course name name name name (won) from September 2, 2014 to October 31, 2014, the number of taxi workers is 7,672,000 on December 5, 2014; and the number is 6,608,000 on June 3, 2015; and the number is 64,64,300 on June 10 to August 9, 2015; 7,18, 168, 200 on September 30, 2015 to October 21, 2014;

B. On June 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that “the instant trainees did not undergo the instant training and failed to meet the completion standards; (b) filed an application for subsidies with the Human Resources Development Service of Korea; and (c) received them,” the Defendant: (a) was amended by Act No. 13902 on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (amended by Act No. 13902, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter “Vocational Skills Development Act”); (b) Article 5(2) of the former Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers; and (c) the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (hereinafter