beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.03.24 2016고정429

업무방해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is the chairperson of the E-building Emergency Measure in the Gunsan-si, and Defendant B and Defendant A have a complaint about the affairs of the Pyeongtaek apartment reconstruction association on the ground that they set the compensation less than the compensation in the above apartment reconstruction association with residents of the above apartment.

On May 12, 2016, at around 08:00, the Defendants interfered with the removal of the victim F's apartment house for about seven hours by force, such as interfering with the removal of one's own car at the above site, such as parking of the car at the above site and sitting down on the back of the scke, and the Defendants interfered with the removal of the scke for about seven hours by force, such as interfering with the removal of the scke, such as entering the place of work to remove the scke in front of the scke.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with D and interfered with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part of each protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Investigation report (related to the verification of the progress of reconstruction and reconstruction construction) / (The victim's assertion that the victim's work is not related to the one-time work, or that it does not fall under the business subject to the protection of interference with business due to the degree of illegality, since the victim was engaged in the removal work of the apartment group, not the removal work of the building possessed by the defendants, at the request of the reconstruction association, not the removal work of the apartment group

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions regarding criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively.

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the suspended sentence: Punishment to be suspended under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act: 200,000 won (amount of fine for negligence in custody per day);

1. The order of provisional payment;