도로교통법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as to the summary of the grounds for appeal: The defendant was not investigated by an investigative agency on the issue of securing a safe distance, and the statement of D alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant has failed to secure a safe distance, but the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged
2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below. The traffic accident of this case occurred after entering the intersection by G operation, which driven the same lane as before the defendant, and stopped from the red light. It seems that the driver of this case was shocked by the defendant's driver's string taxi, and it would not have occurred if the defendant had sufficiently secured the safety distance. D, which prepared the actual yellow survey report in relation to the traffic accident of this case, was stopped by the vehicle moving the red signal from the yellow signal to the front one, and the driver of this case still stopped the rear one of the front one. However, the driver of this case's vehicle is found guilty of the traffic accident of this case by taking account of the following facts:
As such, the defendant's argument is rejected.
3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.