2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The Defendant’s position 1) On December 23, 2008, pursuant to Article 7 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act, the implementer designated and publicly announced the Nam-gu C and D Day as the “E Industrial Complex” (hereinafter “E Industrial Complex”) of the project implementer of the port area pursuant to Article 7 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act. (2) In order to participate in the instant industrial complex development project, the Defendant formed a joint business entity with port area and the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) on April 1, 201 to participate in the instant industrial complex development project. The latter port area changed and publicly announced the project implementer of the instant industrial complex development project from port area to F on August 4, 2011.

On the other hand, joint contractors organized by the Defendant with J et al. were selected as the contractor of the industrial complex development project of this case, and the Defendant became the supervisor of the above joint contractors.

B. Establishment of a joint office and commencement of services 1) Plaintiff and Plaintiff Company G (hereinafter “G”).

2) As to the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal, the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal is with merit.

) In the case of a joint name (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff, etc.”

(2) The instant industrial complex development project’s implementation plan (hereinafter “implementation plan’s comprehensive services”)

(2) The Defendant agreed to contract the members of the joint contractors, the implementation plan and the traffic impact assessment services with the Plaintiff, etc., and the contract entered into with the Plaintiff, etc.

3) On August 201, 201, before entering into a contract regularly with the Plaintiff, the Defendant prepared a business instruction and delivered it to the Plaintiff, etc. Around that time, the Plaintiff et al. prepared a joint office on the eight floor of the KS in Ansan-si, and commenced the comprehensive service and traffic impact assessment service. 4) The two employees of F and two employees of the Defendant were stationed in the said joint office, and the employees of the Plaintiff et al. were posted.