beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.03.26 2019고단5501

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On November 8, 2019, at around 00:10 on November 8, 2019, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) opened a “D convenience store” for the victim C located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu; (b) opened a customer with his/her day-to-day E with his/her day-to-day, and opened a cell phone with his/her day-to-day and one cigarette on the display stand; and (c) opened a cell phone with his/her day-to-day, or repeated his/her behavior to ask the victim for the price for about

Therefore, even though the police officers reported 112 to the effect that “the entry and calculation of the visitors is safe, the knicker is malicious, and the other customers are unable to be calculated,” it was difficult to avoid disturbance for 20 minutes by means of sound, use of violence, etc., even though they were solicited to take the value of goods and return to the police officers dispatched.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store business by force.

2. 모욕 피고인은 2019. 11. 8. 00:30경 위 편의점에서, 위와 같은 신고를 받고 출동한 서울강북경찰서 F파출소 소속 경찰관인 피해자 G과 피해자 H으로부터 물건 값을 계산하고 귀가할 것을 권유받자, 위 C과 다른 손님들이 지켜보고 있는 가운데 피해자들에게 “짭새 씨발 새끼들아”, “좆밥 새끼야”, “양아치 씨발 새끼들”이라는 등의 욕설을 반복하여 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

3. At the date, time, and place of Paragraph 2, the Defendant lost his mobile phone from the above E, the Defendant, who was the Defendant’s driver, sought to walk his mobile phone instead of his her son, and take the above H’s cell phone from his son, hand, and the above H took the H’s arms. Accordingly, the above H took the h’s arms by her son’s hand. The above H was pushed down with her head, and the above h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s head, and continued to restrain this h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s m

In this respect, the Defendant reported the 112 reported case.