The applicant's application for compensation is dismissed respectively.

1. On February 2012, the Defendant against the victim F is expected to complete the construction work with a loan to the victim F in H restaurant located in Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Daejeon, with a view to having the victim F repaid money.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had been living with the husband's subsidies for meritorious services without any property or income, and had been liable for the debts of several million won to the neighbors. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay the borrowed money, and did not think that he would have used it as the construction cost.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received cash of KRW 10,00,000 from the victim, i.e., from the victim; (c) from November 14, 2014; and (d) obtained the delivery of KRW 35,50,000 in total from the victim on five occasions as indicated in attached Table (i) from November 14, 2014.

2. On July 29, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim C is to pay the victim C at the J Beauty-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Daejeon, with “A small child is doing construction work in Jeju-do, and the money is insufficient and the money is lent to it.”

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the damaged person.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received 3,000,000 won from the Saemaul Treasury account (L) in the name of the Defendant’s husband, for the loan from the victim, from the victim; (c) and (d) received 30,000,000 won from the victim on five occasions from January 13, 2014, as described in the List of Crimes, from the time to January 13, 2014.

3. On August 5, 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim E calls from the victim E at an influence place, and “small children gather the building.”