On October 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for life due to a crime of death or injury resulting from fire to a structure existing in the Seoul Northern District Court on June 9, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 9, 2016, is serving in a number of principal prisons.

On June 29, 2017, from around 06:30 to around 06:45, the Defendant suffered two images of the victim’s body 80 degrees her head, face, her head, etc. in the treatment period, her head, her head, etc. on the part of the part of the body, such as the part of the victim’s her head, face, her head, chest, and her chest, etc., which were provided by the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff for the purpose of her head, her face, her head, etc. in the treatment period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D, E, F, and G;

1. Each self-statement of D, E, and H;

1. A work report of I;

1. Application of each investigation report [two copies of the status of prisoners' information by the ward C of the medical ward C, two copies of the records of the victim D's medical obligation, two copies of the relevant pictures (or two copies of the records of the victim's medical treatment at the previous university hospital of North Korea, and two copies of the records of the victim's medical treatment);

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act regarding the pertinent criminal facts

1. Although the defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged that he inflicted an injury on the victim by damaging hot water, the victim's snow was not blick.

2. The written injury diagnosis submitted by the victim of the crime of injury in the legal doctrine generally grasp the cause of injury on the basis of the victim's statement, and then describe the part and degree of injury through mobilization of medical professional knowledge to observe and determine, and it is insufficient to be a direct proof of the fact that the injury as stated was caused by the criminal act of the defendant. However, the date and degree of the diagnosis for the injury.