대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion has leased KRW 30 million to the defendant three times, and the defendant is obligated to pay the above money to the plaintiff.
2. According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and Eul evidence Nos. 3, the plaintiff remitted a total of KRW 40 million to the defendant on October 25, 2010, KRW 10 million on October 27, 2010, KRW 10 million on November 22, 2010, and KRW 40 million on November 22, 201, and the defendant remitted a total of KRW 10 million to the plaintiff on March 2, 2011, respectively.
However, according to the evidence Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the defendant transferred approximately KRW 36,350,000 among the above KRW 40,000,000 remitted from the plaintiff to the account under the name of Eflaz (hereinafter " Eflazz"), and one million, which was remitted from the plaintiff to Eflazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, and there is no reason to acknowledge that the plaintiff remitted money to the defendant.
3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.