However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 20, 2017, around 01:03, the Defendant was notified of a minor crime due to a violation of crossing from C, etc. in the vicinity of the sowing-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu., and from the situation of the B District of the Heung-gu Police Station B, the Defendant was dispatched to another reported site.

1. Around March 20, 2017, the Defendant insultingd the victim of the instant case against the reporting person, etc. of another assaulted incident, in the direction behind the E (E (E) E (E) Maidong-gu, Cheongju-si on March 20, 2017, and without permission during this night against the reporting person, etc. of the instant case

In the case of a brupt area, where the brupted area is cut, it is not a roadway, but a person, who is a person, crossing the area without permission, brupted the victim by openly insulting the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports by the police officer’s 112, such as the defect that C intended to move the patrol vehicle to handle the said assault case, the defect that C attempted to move the patrol vehicle after the patrol vehicle, the operation of the patrol vehicle by holding three times and closing the patrol vehicle, and the operation of the patrol vehicle by opening three times.

Summary of Evidence

The application of the law to the Defendant’s legal statement C’s statement to the effect that the Defendant’s written statement to the 1112 reported case

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

4. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties in Type 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties) basic area (from June to one year and six months) / The decision of sentence / the decision of sentence / the decision of sentence / the driving of the police vehicle, and the crime that interferes with the operation of the police vehicle is not good.

However, it is advantageous to the fact that the defendant reflects the mistake, that there is no previous conviction after 199 and there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine.