However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

At around 13:00 on March 8, 2013, the Defendants instructed the Defendant A and C, who is an employee of the above company, to dispose of 10 seated 6,800,000 won at the market price of the victim owned by the said company, in G factories operated by the victim F, located in the EST 606, the Defendant B, the managing director of the said company, the victim’s failure to manage the victim. Defendant A and C had loaded the above seat on one ton truck and stolen it.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and C;

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H by the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Statement of each police statement made to F and I;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (price and confirmation of ownership of the goods subject to investigation);

1. Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Mitigation of discretionary punishment (hereinafter referred to as "voluntary mitigation") under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of each Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as "offenders"), including the following circumstances: Defendant B is the primary offender; Defendant A and C do not have any criminal record of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the case of defendants in consideration of the same circumstances as the above);