However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a rocketing taxi driver.

On November 2, 2014, at around 14:07, the Defendant runs along the two lanes of the druplet loan located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul at around 861, along the two lanes of the said road, from the frupture to the frupture of the basin.

A two-lane change has been made.

In this case, the defendant who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely change the vehicle line so that it does not cause any hindrance to the passage of another motor vehicle by properly examining the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim to go beyond the road by taking the part on the left side of the victim C (the 26-year-old driver) driving on the second line of the said road due to the negligence in the course of business that changed the fleet to the second line.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, suffered from a fluoral dysium in need of treatment for about one week, and at the same time, the Defendant did not immediately stop the said fluoral so that approximately KRW 694,000 of the repair cost would be considerable, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has no basic area (eight to one to one year and six months) (the special person) (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence] Defendant is a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (the United States Measures after Accidents) on October 9, 2012 after traffic accidents.