2. Even when considering the fact that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case, the victims do not want the punishment at the investigation stage, and the defendant supports the defendant alone, even though each of the crimes of this case is considered, each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant by threatening the victims who did drinking alcohol together with his/her employee who lost his/her mobile phone, by threatening the victims who did so with his/her mobile phone, and by causing bodily injury to the victims, by using dangerous Alkinium alkinium, the victims were detained, and the degree of the crime is not easy in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime, and the degree of the crime was not easy, and there was a history of punishment for various crimes related to the same kind of crime of the past, and all other circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's sentence is too unreasonable and it is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.