When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant is a person who works as C employee located in Daegu Northern-gu B.

On June 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) visited the office of the complainant to open an electronic G5 mobile phone in the name of the complainant; and (b) tried to forge an additional application for subscription to a mobile phone in the name of the complainant for the net time and C performance.

On June 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in the Jeju office located in Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant, using the official approval color pen; (b) prepared “E”, “F”, “F”, and “F” in the automatic transfer column; and (c) forged the HKT mobile phone new contract with the applicant column with the name and signature of the said F and the signature of the said F on proof of fact.

2. On June 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) presented the aforementioned “H mobile phone subscription application form” to an employee who is not aware of the forgery fact; and (b) presented it as if the said “H mobile phone subscription form was actually made.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 231 (Counterfeit of Private Document), 234, 231 (Uttering of Private Document) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.