beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.31 2017노691

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (the punishment of 10 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 160 hours of community service, and 40 hours of compliance driving) is too unreasonable. However, in full view of the various circumstances that are the conditions for the sentencing specified in this case, the above argument is not reasonable, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable since it is too unreasonable (the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable since it is not acknowledged that the defendant was sentenced to the punishment of the defendant. However, the court below erred in finding the criminal facts against the defendant as evidence proving the criminal facts against the defendant without undergoing an examination of evidence, but the remaining evidence alone except this, it did not affect the judgment. Thus, the court below's error did not affect the judgment.