except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 20:00 on March 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report on the Defendant’s act of disturbance after drinking alcohol on the street “C” and received the Defendant’s order to stop from the victim D, the police officer called “I am the same bit of bitch bitch bitch son; (b) I am the bitch son; (c) I am the bitch bit of bitch bitch bitch son; (d) “I am the bitch son; (e) I am the bitch bitch son; (e) I am the son’s chest and the bitch bitch son; and (e) when I am the son’s chest and the body of the victim E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties such as 112 reporting and withdrawal of police officers and crime control.

2. While the Defendant reported about 30 witnesses at the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph 1, the Defendant insultd the victim D by referring “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D, E, and F;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the special person) (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence), the contents of each of the crimes of this case, and the fact that the contents of each of the crimes of this case are against each of the crimes