Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant is obligated to pay the above amount and delay damages to the plaintiff, since the plaintiff lent the above amount to the defendant on April 21, 2006, and KRW 16 million on September 3, 2007, respectively. However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiff lent the above amount to the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.