When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 23, 2016, the Defendant, who refused to leave, found a male-child E before the front door of the victim D's house located in the victim D's 3th floor at Jung-si on March 23, 2016, and had “E is the relocated lessee and has been the director one week prior to the front door of the house.”

The victim's 30 minutes sent out without complying with the request even though he/she was required to leave his/her territory.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave his residence.

2. On January 23, 2016, the Defendant damaged public documents: (a) around 23:25, the police officer of the Gu government police station GJ located in the Gu Government Police Station in the F of the Gu government city, who was arrested as a flagrant offender due to a crime of intrusion upon residence around January 23, 2016; (b) 1 and one “written confirmation of the Defendant arrested and detained for arrest and detention for official duties” used in the said G police station, which was prepared to the effect that “the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to a crime of intrusion upon residence at around 23:05 on January 23, 2016; and (c) denied the intrusion upon residence; and (d) reduced the effectiveness of the said documents in both hands

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on damaged documents;

1. Relevant Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (a violation of eviction), Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a violation of the invalidation of documents for public use), and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the fact that the defendant has a criminal record identical to that of the defendant for the reason of sentencing.