유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반등
The judgment below
Of those, the conviction against Defendant A shall be reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
. Prosecutors;
The judgment of the court below which sentenced to one punishment, even though the violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts under Article 32 (6) of the Act on Corporate Governance of Financial Companies should be sentenced separately from other crimes, is erroneous in the misunderstanding of legal principles in violation of Article 388 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
The sentence of the lower court against the Defendants (with respect to the Defendants: 2 years and 6 months; 1 year of imprisonment; 2 years of probation; community service order; 1 year of imprisonment with prison labor; 2 years of probation; 3 years of probation; 4 years of community service order; 2 years of probation; 3 million won of community service order; and 4 million won of fine: Defendant D) is too unreasonable.
Defendant
A (unfair sentencing) The sentence sentenced by the court below (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
The court below found the Defendants guilty on the following facts: (a) the receipt of similar facts in the facts charged against the Defendants (No. 11, 15, 17, 20 through 22, 26, 28, 33 through 35, 38, 51, 53, 59, 74, 80, 82, 84, 84, 90, 94, 97, 125, 157, 160, 161, 163, 164, 171, 173, 176, 179, 180, 202, 203, 209, 2226, 232, 2335, 240, 241, and part of the charges charged against A (excluding the Defendants’ fraud).
Defendant
A and the prosecutor appealed only for the guilty portion on the grounds of misunderstanding of the legal principles and misunderstanding of the sentencing, and the defendant C also submitted a petition of appeal, but did not submit a written reason for appeal within the period for submission of the written reason for appeal. On April 3, 2018, the appeal was dismissed.
The part of the judgment of the court below on the charge of the act of receiving similar goods and the charge of fraud that the court below found not guilty on the grounds of the judgment shall be judged to be guilty on the charge of the act of receiving similar goods, the fact of fraud and the