대여금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, 8-1, 2, and 1.
The plaintiff (formerly changed: CaseM is a rearrangement project owner registered as a rearrangement project management business owner under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the "Urban Improvement Act"), and the defendant is a reconstruction association established for the purpose of housing reconstruction improvement project (hereinafter referred to as the "renovation project of this case") in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu.
B. On August 10, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into a special management service agreement for the reconstruction project (hereinafter “instant service agreement”) with the Defendant Association Promotion Committee, setting the contract amount of KRW 2.897 billion as the contract amount for the reconstruction project of this case (excluding value-added tax). The main contents of the instant service agreement are as follows.
A A Housing Reconstruction Project Specialized Management Service Contract (A Evidence No. 1)
8. (A) Business 1) 2) Business feasibility review: 3) Administrative support 4) Business preparation and vicarious execution for the designation of a designer and contractor; 5) Business preparation and vicarious execution 6) Administrative support for the Defendant Cooperative's promotion committee, including the promotion committee, etc. 7) Other expenses incurred for the specialized management services of the instant reconstruction project entrusted by the Defendant Cooperative's promotion committee under Article 69 (1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents") and the expenses incurred for the instant reconstruction project entrusted by the Defendant Cooperative's promotion committee at the request of the Defendant Cooperative's promotion committee, the Plaintiff shall first take measures to confirm the cost for the services entrusted by the Plaintiff and the unpaid service charges during the period of operation of the Defendant Cooperative's promotion committee