At around January 2012, the Defendants heard the lecture of the qualification certificate from the “I” research institute operated by the victim H, and conspired to make materials related to the qualification certificate of a localr in the private teaching institute operated by Defendant B by utilizing the details of distribution or acquired materials in the above lecture.

A. On July 2013, Defendant A, in violation of each Copyright Act stated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of the crime, made a lecture by reproducing the content of “F (Gu G) on the second floor of the above E building,” which is the main content of the draft of the lecture of the patent in which the victim’s copyright is copyright, such as “fluorcing and lighting in color,” “fluoring in color,” “fluoring in color,” “fluoring in color,” and “fluoring in-speed test type work,” and Defendant B opened the Defendant A’s lecture as a paid lecture at the above education center.

In addition, the Defendants infringed the victim’s literary work from January 2013 to the above day in the same manner as the written list of crimes in the attached Table.

B. At around May 2013, the Defendants violated the Copyright Act due to reproduction, the core summary of H’s license “A” in the instant F, and the core summary of H’s “J’s “J”, which was inserted in H’s NA car page, presented as the book, and each month, violated H’s literary works by receiving approximately KRW 5,000 won per ticket to approximately 20 students of private teaching institutes and selling them under the name of clothes.

2. Determination as to the violation of each copyright law indicated in the list of offenses in the separate sheet

(a) seek to describe the relevant legal principles (i) universal academic theories in the field of expertise;