A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months, by a fine of 25,00,000 won, and by imprisonment for 1 and 6 months.

1. Defendant A, in the name of the Defendants and the background of the case, actually carried out the “O business” ordered by L Gun from July 2009 to April 30, 2015, with the trade name of the former L Gun, as a person who carries on construction business in the former L Gun. Defendant B is a person who carries on construction business in the L Gun with the trade name of P. Defendant C is a head of L Gun forest association, who has maintained a close relationship between L Gun M and approximately 30 years, and Defendant D was a person who was used to assist M in the political activities of M in approximately KRW 5 million every month from around 20 years to April 30, 2015.

Defendant

A A was in charge of the foregoing project on October 17, 2014 while the project period for the project of the instant “O project” was extended to KRW 173,56,000 (the contracted amount of KRW 147,154,000, and the government-funded amount of KRW 26,412,000) since February 24, 2014 to December 30, 2014.

L A public official Q Q’s portion of the construction project to increase 230m and the total construction cost of KRW 190 million was increased to KRW 100,000,000, and obtained approval from M., but M did not approve the “report on the design change (plan)” without any particular reason, and the expiration date of the construction period became different.

Criminal facts

A. As the Defendant A and B’s joint crime was anticipated to be deemed to have suffered approximately KRW 60 million in the event that no design change was made to increase the construction cost as above on November 201, 2014, Defendant A and Defendant B, a party with the interest of the said construction contractor, talked on the above circumstances to Defendant B, and the change of the betting amount from Defendant B “L head of the Gun would have been possible if the betting amount was first determined.”

“To receive the proposal “,” and through M M, through C, through which it was accepted, solicited M to approve the design change of the above construction work, and, in return, solicited to deliver KRW 20 million of cash of 10% of the increased construction cost to M.

Defendant

B From November 2014 to December 201, 2014, Police Officers.