The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Examining the records in light of the relevant legal principles, the court below affirmed the judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim of this case on the ground that ① there is no object of the instant sales contract, or it is not possible to achieve the purpose of the sales contract, and ② the consent and notification of the Korean Snick Micro Systems Limited Company cannot be deemed necessary for the transaction between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the evaluation of a sales contract, or by recognizing facts contrary to logical

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.