공사대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 59,288,50 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from October 16, 2012 to December 18, 2014.
(c) recognize that part of the construction has not been executed, and that additional construction cost is 38,000 won;
③ Shell beam basic n beamline altered construction: Recognizing that construction was conducted in two widths for each connecting part, and that construction was conducted in one width, the cost of reconstruction is KRW 1,534,000.
(4) Alteration and construction of assembly of a roof C-type river: It is recognized that the folding part of the roof fluorine (PUR UN) adjoining to fluor is recognized.
However, considering the fact that the foregoing modified work does not seem to have caused any particular defect in the function and safety aspect, while all of the melting parts are separated and excessive costs are required to re-fixed at V, this part of the defect can be recognized as only KRW 547,00,00, which is the difference between the cost of construction where the repair cost is excessive and the cost of construction where the altered construction is performed.
⑤ The reduction construction of the home-line diameter of the roof of the main roof 200*200 meters is recognized that the home-line diameter was built with 250*250 meters.
However, considering the fact that there is no particular defect in the function and safety due to the foregoing modified work, while excessive expenses are needed to replace the said defect to the home line of the agreed standard, this part of the defect can be recognized as only KRW 389,00,00, which is the difference between the cost of construction where the construction was executed in accordance with the design drawing because the cost of repair is excessive as it is an insignificant defect.
6) Revised construction of the diameter of the main line line line duct: The main line line line line line pipe was constructed with a 125m radius from the PVC 125m radius, but it is recognized that the main line line pipe was constructed with a 100m radius of the main line line pipe, but it used materials more superior than the materials agreed upon by the defendant at the defendant's request and it is not recognized as defects due to the lack of defects, such
7. Partial failure of a main line home duct: The main line home duct was to be constructed with 12 main lines and 80,000 main lines.