A. The Defendant is a businessman who actually operates the business of manufacturing synthetic resin and other plastic substances with the trade name “N” from M on the racing.

Non-partyO registered as N's business operator is a representative in the name of the defendant's spouse.

B. The Plaintiffs were employed by N and provided labor as production workers.

The period during which the plaintiffs worked in N is as stated in the “period of work” in the attached claim amount table, and wages not paid by the defendant for the provision of labor during that period shall be stated in the “amount of delayed payment” column in the attached claim amount table, and the sum shall be as stated in the “amount of claim” column.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs the amount stated in the "request amount sheet" of the attached claim amount sheet, which is unpaid to the plaintiffs, and to pay damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum from the date stated in the attached claim amount sheet of which 14 days elapse to the date of full payment. Thus, the plaintiffs' claims for this payment are with merit.

B. The defendant asserts that the defendant received a labor contract from P Co., Ltd., and had the plaintiffs work in the form of dispatch to theRa who belongs to the above company, and that the above company reported the plaintiffs' wages as rehabilitation claims including the plaintiffs' wages.

Although the defendant appears to the purport that the plaintiffs should receive wages from the above company that is not the defendant, it cannot be viewed that the defendant's obligation to pay the above wages is denied merely because the defendant asserts.

3. Therefore, we decide as per Disposition by admitting all the plaintiffs' claims.