On October 25, 2013, the Defendant listened to the Defendant’s office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for the Victim D Management of the Victim of Samsung Buildings, and the Defendant’s office in the U.S. and Mexico that the Victim Management Company should receive an order of S4 interviewer and distribution jum jum in order to supply it, and the Defendant’s “the officer of Samsung electronic company is known, and the E officers, who are Samsung Electronic subordinate businesses, are also aware of the fact, can secure the order volume by reducing refined goods.

In this regard, the payment of advance payment was made to Samsung Electronic Officers, etc., and the payment was made first, and was made falsely.

However, in fact, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party under the name of Samsung Gallon S4 S4 interviewer, and as a cost of distribution, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to supply the lusium or parts.

The Defendant, as a price for goods from the damaged person, is the first bank account in the name of the Defendant on October 25, 2013; KRW 18,182,300 on October 12, 2013; KRW 18,182,30 on the 31st of the same month; KRW 10,00,000 on November 10, 2013; and the same month.

7. received the remittance of KRW 44,846,00 in total of KRW 44,542,50.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. Entry of the defendant's partial statement and F, and each statement of D in the protocol concerning the examination of the defendant by the prosecution against the defendant;

1. Statement protocol of the police with D (net 8);

1. F's certificate of fact;

1. A letter of certification, contract, statement of passbook transaction (net 4,12), contract, certificate of transfer confirmation, mail (net 9,20), INVOICE, airline ticket, first contract, second contract, third contract, account transaction details (net 30), appeal document, text message photograph (net 37,38), e-mail, etc. (net 41), account statement (net 45), investigation report (report on the results of tracking the search account) / [the defendant refused to accept the goods although he prepared to supply the goods ordered to the victim, it is significant that he refused to do so.