beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.02 2015고단5596

사기등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the corporation F2 in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant B is the operator of H in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, and Defendant C is a corporation established for the purpose of painting construction and steel product construction business.

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant was aware of the fact that construction should be conducted using only the paints approved by the ordering authority among the special paints stipulated in the Seoul Metropolitan Government road indication specifications, which are ordered by the road business office under the Seoul Metropolitan Government and each Gu office (on a leading color).

However, as the Defendant anticipated that, when executing the tea coloring construction solely with the rent approved in advance, it would have been predicted that profits will be less, the Defendant would obtain money from the Defendant by using the “Raining business” royalty by mixing it with the lower quality and price, and by submitting a false report of completion as if he completed the construction by using only the “Rain business” royalty approved in advance.

Accordingly, the Defendant submitted a false completion system to the effect that “The Defendant completed the above-mentioned guidance construction work using only special paints to public officials in the name of the business office in Seoul Special Metropolitan City as Dong Branch around February 29, 2012, even though the Defendant, in the process of performing the construction of the J as awarded a successful bid by the Dong branch of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, mixed the KSM6080 general melting-type 4 general melting design with the KSM 5:5 ratio,” the Defendant submitted a false completion system to the effect that “Around February 29, 2012, public officials in the name of the business office in the Dong branch of Seoul Special Metropolitan City,

As above, the defendant deceivings a public official in the name of the Dong-dong-ro Seoul Metropolitan Government and receives KRW 340,860,000 from the Dong-dong-ro, Seoul to receive the payment of KRW 340,860,00 for the construction cost from the Dong-ro, Seoul, and from that time until February 28, 2013, the defendant received the total construction cost of KRW 1,118,262,240 for four times, such as the previous list of crimes (1).