유류대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff supplied oil directly to the defendant or agreed to issue a tax invoice in the name of the defendant to B (C) who lent the defendant's name.
2. Determination
A. First, as to whether the Plaintiff supplied oil directly to the Defendant, it is difficult to believe that the witness D’s testimony that corresponds thereto is difficult, and the remainder of the Plaintiff’s submission alone is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
B. Next, it is difficult to view that the Defendant permitted B to engage in the business by using the name of the Defendant solely on the basis of the fact that the Defendant consented B to the use of the name as the name of the name, and that the Defendant was liable to the name of the name holder, and that the Defendant allowed B to issue the tax invoice with the Defendant supplied. The evidence of the Plaintiff’s submission alone is insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.