2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On June 27, 2006, the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) entered the Army and completed a new path training course at the Army, and was placed in the 158 Campal Zone on August 4, 2006 at the 158 Campal Zone, which was located in the 158 Campal Zone.

B. On September 9, 2006, the Deceased returned to the military unit on September 10, 2006, which was the following day after the Deceased was permitted to stay outside the military, and was committed on September 10, 2006 by releasing his guns from the military unit, while serving as a guard at the inorganic and sentry.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On March 8, 2007, the Army Headquarters had made a decision that recognized the deceased as having committed suicide. D.

The plaintiffs are parents of the deceased.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 5, purport of whole pleading

2. The commander of the unit to which the plaintiffs asserted, caused the death of the deceased by violating his duty to protect and care for the deceased on the ground that he violated his duty to manage, supervise, and supervise the deceased’s personal affairs, and his duty to care. As a result, the deceased sustained damages of KRW 206,157,572, consolation money, KRW 40,000,000 for funeral expenses, KRW 3 million for funeral expenses, and KRW 10,000 for consolation money, respectively, and the plaintiffs inherited the deceased’s property.

As part of the claim against the Defendant, the Plaintiffs seek payment of KRW 20 million among the above damages (i.e., funeral expenses of KRW 1,00,000,000 for lost income of KRW 15,000 for funeral expenses) and damages for delay.

3. Whether extinctive prescription for the right to claim damages expires;

A. The defendant's assertion that the damages claim by the plaintiffs had expired due to the statute of limitations. Thus, even if the damages claim against the deceased and the defendant were established as alleged by the plaintiffs, it should be determined as to whether the statute of limitations had expired already, as alleged by the plaintiffs.

cause of a tort.