beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2012.11.21 2012고단1177

특수절도

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, as against Defendant B and C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Defendants】

1. Defendant A was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor or 2 years of suspended sentence for special larceny, etc. at the Jeju District Court on July 20, 2011, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on July 28, 201, and is still subject to suspended sentence.

2. On May 11, 2012, Defendant C was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor and three years of suspended execution due to special larceny in the same court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 19, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant C’s special larcenyed the following: (a) in soup, the Defendants were willing to take out the cell phone left in the fry by cutting off the cell phone and then sell it by selling it.

Around 03:50 on December 21, 2011, the Defendant B found at the sobry E 200,000 won of the market price of the victim F was set up in the scar equivalent to 500,000,000 won of the victim F in charge of the head, and the Defendant A, Defendant C, and Defendant C kept all of the above mobile phones possessed by the victim B in the sobro, and thereby, the Defendants used the above method as follows: one cell phone with a 400,000 square meters of the victim’s market price, one cell phone with a 60,000,000 won of the victim’s H; one cell phone with a 8,000,0000 won of the victim’s J-owned market price; and one cell phone with a scar on the victim’s K market price.

Accordingly, the Defendants, together, stolen six mobile phones of the victims.

2. At around 14:36 on December 23, 2011, Defendant B and Defendant A’s special larceny: (a) laid down one cell phone of Samsung Ggalthro 2 mobile phone value at the LPC bank in Jeju-si; (b) kept one cell phone value of KRW 800,000,000,000 in its own market value; (c) laid down the CCTV camera in body so as not to raise Defendant A; and (d) Defendant B and the Defendants jointly stolen one cell phone value of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.