When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 18, 2016, at around 04:17, the Defendant requested the victim D (Namnam and 26 years of age) who is an employee of the above convenience store to cook the food that he calculated. However, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force for approximately 20 minutes, such as: (a) the victim was able to explain and directly cook the cooking law; (b) whether it is necessary to do so; (c) whether it is necessary to do so; and (d) whether it is necessary to do so; and (d) the police should report it to the police; and (e) the victim’s convenience store business by a b0-minute force, such as: (a) the customer who had entered the convenience store by avoiding the disturbance, is unable to enter the disturbance; and (b) the victim’s convenience store business is obstructed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;