The part concerning the first, second, third, and fourth crimes in the judgment shall be reversed.

As to the first and fourth crimes of the above judgment of the defendant.

A. The Defendant did not commit any mistake of facts (as to the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the original court) with regard to the facts charged, but did not kill or cause the victim as the date and time of the instant crime, together with his/her wife.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (Article 1 and 4 of the original decision: life imprisonment and Articles 2 and 3 of the decision of the court below: Imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 5 and 6 of the decision of the court below: imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 원심 판시 제1, 4죄(살인죄, 현주건조물방화죄, 2011. 11. 19.자 절도죄) 부분 (1) 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 (가) 이 부분 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 피해자 C(여, 59세)의 아들 D과 2010년경부터 동거하는 사이인데, 평소 피해자가 아들 D과의 만남에 대해 반대하는 것에 불만을 품고 있던 중, D이 피해자의 뜻에 따라 피고인과의 관계를 정리하고 우즈베키스탄에서 신부감을 마련하기로 하자 이에 좌절한 나머지 D이 출국한 틈을 이용하여 피해자를 살해하기로 마음먹고, D을 통하여 피해자가 새벽녘에 피해자가 경영하는 편의점에서 잠을 잔다는 사실을 알아냈다.

On December 7, 2011, at around 03:10 on December 7, 2011, the Defendant: (a) putting in a white paper a fluorial bag a fluence containing the transit points prepared in advance at the F convenience points operated by the victim in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; and (b) resulting in a cresh not to pay attention to the employees G by concealing lethal weapons; (c) resulting in the death of the victim from damage to the two parts of the said dangerous weapons, thereby killing the victim; and (d) resulting in the death of the victim from the two parts of the said dangerous weapons; and (e) caused the death of the victim to spread the transit to the entire convenience points, thereby extinguishing all of the above convenience points at which G is located, which amounting to 5,600,000 won.

(B) First, the lower court’s judgment 1 and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court.