However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 07:00 on June 30, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, by avoiding disturbance, such as passing a disturbance along with a severe bath for about 10 minutes on the ground that the movement ordered the victim D (n, 61 years of age) who is an employee in the restaurant, is not prompt, and preventing customers from entering the restaurant, and thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. At around 08:00 on June 30, 2016, the Defendant was urged to return home from F in the situation where the Gyeonggi Government Police Station E zone affiliated with the Gyeonggi Government Police Station E zone, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a report as described in paragraph (1), and was asked to ask questions about personal information, and the Defendant expressed the above F that “I will see why I am am, why I will see, why I am am, and if I will die, I will see it.” On the other hand, the Defendant saw F’s right shoulder by putting F on the right shoulder, and then embling it with f’s spherbling, and assaulted on several occasions.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. Each statement of D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to screen screen pictures suspending motion pictures and photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend lectures;

1. Scope of recommendations according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Class 1 crime (Interference with Business) (Scope of Recommendation) and category 1 (Interference with Business) (1 to 8 months) (including specially mitigated persons), the area of mitigation (1 to 8 months) (including serious efforts to recover damage);

B. Second Crimes (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) (Scope of Recommendation) are the basic sphere (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties.