A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. At around 06:30 on February 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven the “F” front of the “F” parking lot located in Jeju Island; and (b) driven the same road in the same Eup and Myeon while driving the immediately preceding car with the taxi driven by the victim B (ma, 54 years old); and (c) sent a bath to the Plaintiff due to the vehicle overtaking, etc.; (b) while the Plaintiff was in dispute with the Plaintiff, while driving the taxi in front of the said Eup and driving the car in front of the said Eup and taking the bath, the Defendant B sawd the Plaintiff’s her seat to her seat up to the said parking lot; and (d) while the dispute between B and the Plaintiff’s her driver and his spouse, the Defendant her spouse (ma2 years old) took the franchial phone and took the Defendant’s bath to her bath.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on B such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and injury on G, such as cerebral tension, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. Defendant B inflicted injury on the victim, on the foregoing reasons, on the part of the victim A (mama, 53 years of age) in the parking lot, on the part of the victim, due to the breathing of the breath of the victim, and the breathing of the breath, and the breath of the breath, thereby damaging the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each part of the witness A, B and G;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the Defendants who choose punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.