beta
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2020.03.04 2019가단31852

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s father F (hereinafter “the deceased”) around July 10, 1980: (a) around G 1,015 square meters (hereinafter “instant G land”); (b) around August 1, 1980, around H 486 square meters prior to H (hereinafter “instant H land”); and (c) around December 18, 1971, the Plaintiff’s father F constituted 3,614 square meters of an I orchard 3,614 square meters of forest originally around 3,614 square meters; and (d) on June 15, 2011, the registration conversion was registered.

(hereinafter “instant I land”) was purchased, and on February 4, 2015, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer based on inheritance by consultation and division on October 30, 2014.

B. As to the instant land adjacent to the instant land, J completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 3, 1972, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on January 4, 2016 by Defendant B, K, L, and Defendant B on January 23, 2018.

(Gift 22, 2018, the cause of registration). (C)

As to the instant land adjoining to the instant G and H land, Defendant clan completed registration of initial ownership on July 13, 1994.

At present, trees are planted on the land in the first industrial zone and the land in the second industrial zone, and the plaintiff occupies each industrial zone.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including virtual numbers), the result of appraisal by the senior branch office of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In around 1971, the Deceased purchased the I land of this case. At the time, the current status of the I land of this case included the I land of this case.

In addition, around 1980, the Deceased purchased the instant G and H land, and at the time, the current status of the instant G and H land included the second disputing land.

Ultimately, the Deceased purchased all the land in the first and second instances, and occupied the land in the first and second instances in peace and public performance from around that time with the intention of possession. The Plaintiff succeeded to the possession of the Deceased. At least, the Plaintiff succeeded to the G, H, and I’s land.