If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was administered along with the victim D (at 21 years of age) who was frightened in a cross-dissected telecom in the military-sected Kamera Si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, and (b) had a sexual intercourse with the victim at around 07:07 on the same day when the victim was under the influence of alcohol, and (c) took a video image of the victim’s chest and sexual part of the body.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of another person, which could cause sexual humiliation or shame, against his will, using a camera.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Where a conviction of a defendant against a sex offense subject to the registration of personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to a related agency pursuant to Article 43 of

Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse shall be comprehensively considered in light of the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type, motive, process, seriousness of the crime in this case, the degree and expected side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to the disclosure order or notification order, the preventive effect of the sexual crime subject to registration which may be achieved therefrom, and the effect of protecting the victims, etc.