1. On December 6, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 19:15, the Defendant was driving a brily cargo vehicle from the 22 km section to the exit of the sloping brig in the same military via Defendant’s house, at the time of the Mexico-gun, the Mexico-si, Mancheon-si, Mancheon-si, Mexico-si, Mexico-si, Mexico-si, Mexico-si, Mexico-si, Mexico-si, in a state of alcohol leveling to 0.14%.

2. Around December 21, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused before the risk) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle at a speed of about 60 to 70 km in the speed of speed in the direction of salarying from the small river direction in the direction of salarying the two-lane road, which is the central cost of separation of Riin-gun as a song-gun, by driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in the direction where it is permitted to drive the motor vehicle in a way that allows the driving

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the Defendant’s vehicle driving in this station in accordance with the victim D (59 tax) who drives a small-scale taxi normally in the opposite direction with the Defendant’s vehicle due to the negligence of driving ahead of the two lanes in the two-lanes of the said center while under the influence of alcohol. In order to avoid the collision, the Defendant changed the vehicle to the right side of the instant small-type taxi into the two-lane in the same direction as the victim E (n.e., the 49 years old) driving of the said small-type taxi with the two-lane in the same direction.

Then, the Defendant continued to drive along the same lane as above, and continued to drive the Defendant Company G (48 S) with the top-hand part of the Defendant Company’s left-hand side of the vehicle, and received the top-hand part of the Defendant Company G (48 S) driving.

In this respect, the Defendant is so drinking.