If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in B the test.

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant continued to turn to the left at an outer elementary school in the direction of the Cheongju City from the direction of the Cheongju City. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant continued to turn to the left from the direction of the Cheongju City.

Since a signal, etc. is installed at the front of that place, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a vehicle passing through the intersection by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely in accordance with the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of violating the left-hand turn signal even though the vehicle driving signal is straighted, the front part of the driver's vehicle in front of the driver's vehicle was driven by the victim E (V, 54 years old) who entered the intersection in the direction of the traffic signal in the direction of the city of Cheongju in the direction of the city of Cheongju, the front part of the driver's vehicle in front of the vehicle operated by the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence on the part of the passengers G (V, 38 years old) of the Defendant’s vehicle, for approximately two weeks, injury, such as catum salt, etc., which requires a two-day medical treatment, to the driver of the damaged vehicle, including the right leg and the pelle, etc., which require a eight-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A H statement;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.