정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at around 06:40 on January 31, 2016, at the Defendant’s residence located in Cheongju-si Office C, 908 Dong 503, 503, the Defendant, using his smartphones to NAE for the purpose of slandering the victim D, and using “G” as the title “G” using the clinic called “F” and, at the same time, the head of this private teaching institute opened a private teaching institute as a director and the head of this private teaching institute and opened a private teaching institute as a staff member, thereby causing fraud to students and parents.
The president of a private teaching institute who falsely advertises that he/she is a doctor’s degree without majoringing dance in a university, or failing to Hace H.
A large amount of money is required for students who are not in a private teaching institute to do so under the pretext of works, and if they do not receive the works, you will do so inciting them.
When a person who does not major in dances at a university but does not have the foundation and ability, he/she shall give his/her own class of anti-occination.
The article is written and posted.
However, in fact, the victim was in the dance department at the H University graduate school after majoringing in the I college, and the victim did not make a false statement to the students and parents of the dance institute by demanding large amounts of students or following the students to do so.
Ultimately, with the aim of slandering a person, the Defendant updated facts openly through an information and communications network, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim.
2. Determination
A. “Purpose of slandering a person” under Article 70 of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. is required to express an intent or purpose, and whether a person is intended to defame a person may be damaged or damaged by the expression, taking into account all the circumstances, such as the content and nature of the relevant publicly alleged fact, the scope of the other party to whom the relevant fact was published, the method of expression, etc.