사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
In light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and theories of this case, including the fact that the Defendant appealed from punishment of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) too much and unfair, but there were many criminal records of the Defendant, and the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case repeatedly against many victims without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had committed a repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, etc., even though considering the fact that the victims’ damages were most recovered, the Defendant’s family relationship, economic situation, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court for the reasons as stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.
Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the "S6" of the 3rd of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected as "a stamp S6 at the time of galloning", and the "data on the status of swimming" of the 3rd of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected as "data on the status of acceptance", respectively.