2. When Defendant A does not pay the above fine, 50.

1. At around 14:40 on April 19, 2006, Defendant A refused to comply with the demand of the Defendant for the suspension order on the bitr vehicle (C) operated by the Defendant in order to verify whether the restriction on the quantity of load was violated on the front of the Busan Metropolitan City Construction and Testing Office, from the control team belonging to the Busan Metropolitan City Construction and Safety Laboratory Office.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, refused a suspension order for measuring the load, as described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement made by the defendant A in compliance with this Act;

1. Statement made to be suitable for such statement among the suspect interrogation records prepared by the defendant A in the preparation of judicial police assistant;

1. A statement made in the statement made by the defendant limited liability company B, which fit for such statement;

1. A statement prepared in compliance with any of the statements;

1. Application of each video-related statute to each of the photographs appropriate therefor;

1. Relevant legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Defendant 2 of Articles 83 (1) 3 and 54 (4) of the Road Act (elective of fines): Articles 86, 83 (1) 3 and 54 (4) of the Road Act;

1. Defendant 1 confined in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act