Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At around 03:30 on June 2, 2014, the Defendant removed 1,000 won of the “The Home Plus Ordinance” in front of the “The Home Plus Ordinance”, with knowledge of the fact that the removal of banner would be compensated for KRW 1,000 per piece from the moment of the netcheon City, the Defendant removed 7 placards of the Office of Education of Do governor, who is affiliated with each of the C Party, Daranam-do candidates Do Governors who belong to each of the F Party, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 3, 2014, 1, 3, 1,000 won per each of the Blanam-do candidates E, 1,000 won per piece.

Accordingly, the Defendant removed the banner of the election for public office and the superintendent of the Office of Education without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s partial statement

Article 240(1) of the Public Official Election Act (the removal of local election banner), Article 49(1) of the Local Education Autonomy Act, Article 240(1) of the Public Official Election Act, Article 49(1) of the Public Official Election Act, Article 240 of the Public Official Election Act (the removal of a local election banner), Article 40(1) of the Public Official Election Act, Articles 40 and 50 of the same Act, for the purpose of sentencing of Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, for the following reasons: the defendant removed the election banner of local elections and the candidates of the Superintendent of the Provincial Office of Education without justifiable grounds; the right to know the right of the voters, fairness in the election, utility of the election management, etc.

Even if the number of placards removed by the defendant is not many, it is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant was removed to have no particular income due to the age of 77 years, and to receive compensation.