구상금
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and it is like the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance in addition to the following specifications: (a) the reasoning of this case is stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Defendants asserted that (2) out of the injury of the victim, the injury was only caused by the slurgical slurgical slurgical slurgical slurgical slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic sl
However, according to Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, immediately after the occurrence of the accident in this case, injury to the victim was found in the first half of the first half of the first half of the year, the first half of the first half of the year, and the second half of the year after the accident in this case, and the second half of the year after April 7, 2009, the second half of the second half of the accident in the second half of the year after the accident in this case was confirmed all the above injury was confirmed in the MRI image taken on April 1, 2009, and the second half of the year after April 7, 2009. The victim conducted the second half of the half of the year first half of the year second of the accident in this case. Considering the fact that the victim complained of the second half of the year second of the accident in this case that the second half of the year second of the accident in this case was highly probable between the second half of the year second half of the accident in this case and the second half of the year second half of the accident in this case.
Meanwhile, according to the results of the appraisal of the medical records on the director of the central university hospital of the court of first instance, in the case of the IMI video taken on September 8, 2009, the opinion of the prostebrity in part is not observed.