beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.08 2015고단4348

컴퓨터등사용사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 to 12 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Seized evidence 13 to 13.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The telephone financial fraud organization planned to commit the crime refers to a false statement by phoneing to an unspecified number of people in Korea while operating the call center in China, and it is planned and instructed to commit the crime of receiving money from the said people, obtaining personal information of the said people, obtaining a secret account number, etc., and then withdrawing the money through the method of unlawful withdrawal from the account (hereinafter referred to as “sovering”). To commit the crime, the aforementioned organization takes part in the role such as “passing the passbook” through which a large number of people gather the passbook in the form of a braille organization in Korea, “passing the passbook,” “passing the passbook,” “passing the passbook,” “passing the passbook,” “passing the money transferred from the victims,” and “transfering the money transferred from abroad.”

On March 2015, the Defendant received a proposal from a person with no name (one named “C”) who became aware of the website to demand the payment of an allowance, and agreed to take over the passbook and to take a measure to withdraw the passbook, and agreed to take part in the crime of the said telephone financial fraud.

2. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall borrow or lend a means of access or keep, deliver or distribute a means of electronic financial transactions with the knowledge that such means are to be used for a crime or to be used for such crime;

Nevertheless, around March 26, 2015, according to the above plan, the Defendant received from the above-mentioned person E bank body check from the above-mentioned person for the purpose of using it for crime in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

In addition, the Defendant received 28 means of access from March 20, 2015 to March 26, 2015 from March 20, 2015 and kept the means of access of each electronic financial transaction in the same manner as shown in attached Table 1.

3. Computer-use fraud and fraud.