When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 23, 2018, the Defendant, at around 23:40 on March 23, 2018, taken the taxi under the influence of alcohol from a single-name “brea-gu under the influence of alcohol”, which is in Songcheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-do, and did not speak for accurate destination, and she saw the above B as a virtue vibration and vibration, and she took a bath.

이에 위 B는 같은 날 23:50 경 전주시 덕진구 C 전주 덕진 경찰서 D 지구대로 이동하여 위 지구대 소속 경찰관인 경사 E에게 도움을 요청하였고, 위 E이 피고인을 하차시켜 무슨 일인지 확인하자 갑자기 E에게 “ 야, 인마” 라며 욕을 하면서 오른쪽 주먹으로 위 E의 왼쪽 빰을 1회 때리고, 지구대 안으로 들어간 후에도 경찰관들을 향해 계속 욕설을 하여 위 지구대 소속 경찰관인 경사 F이 이를 제지하자 신고 있던 신발을 벗어 F의 왼쪽 뺨을 1회 때려 경찰관의 범죄 예방을 위한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E, F, and B;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (Selection of penalty)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Crimes against police officers who perform official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act should be punished strictly. However, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant is subject to a fine by taking into account the conditions of sentencing favorable to the Defendant, the age, environment, and family relations of the Defendant, including the fact that the Defendant is aware of and reflects the criminal act, the Defendant appears to have committed contingent crimes under the influence of alcohol, and there is no record of criminal punishment.