If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On December 1, 2018, around 17:48, the Defendant: (a) was boarding a D taxi vehicle operated by the victim C in front of Sung-gu, Sungwon-si; and (b) went back to the Ethm of the window of Changwon-si, the destination of which is the destination.

However, there was no money held by the Defendant at the time, so even at the destination, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay taxi charges to the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained economic benefits by being provided with taxi transport services equivalent to the market value of KRW 6,200 from the victim, and not paying the price.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired pecuniary benefits from the victim.

2. The Defendant, on January 14, 2019, was on a taxi operated by the Victim G (year 62) at the front of the window of the Changwon-si on January 16:35, 2019 and returned home.

The victim caused the victim to set up a taxi and get the victim to get off the taxi on the ground that the victim does not drive his own way on the way he thought, and then, the victim "I am on the part of a single drinking" and "I am am on the part of a single drinking". The victim suffered bodily injury such as a shoulder and a ambling of a bat that require treatment for about two weeks by booming the bat of a bat and cutting down the bat of a bat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the defendant had been punished several times for the same or similar crimes, he/she went to each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime.

However, it is against the defendant when committing a crime.