A. The parties concerned are the operators of G Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) who performed an operation for the Plaintiff A (H and inn). The Plaintiff is the patient who received an operation and treatment at the Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff B is the spouse of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C, D, and E are children.

B. On December 2, 2014, Plaintiff A, including an existing surgery, received from the I Hospital a face-to-face collision with the right dog, a face-to-face spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic spopics

Since September 28, 2016, the RI test conducted by the said hospital to observe the RI as a result of the RI shooting, “a small number of narrow lines of the shouldering space and the establishment of a pipe with a checkout certificate,” and was recommended to provide preserved treatment.

C. On October 7, 2016, Plaintiff A was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized on October 11, 2016, and on October 12, 2016, Plaintiff A received the Defendant’s “contestine routing, routing, and routing, routing, and routing, routing,” and discharged Plaintiff A from the Defendant on October 18, 2016.

1) On November 25, 2016, Plaintiff A received a statement of opinion that “the check is separated from radiation image,” and that “the check is required to be provided at a university hospital level.” On December 19, 2016, Plaintiff A received a statement of opinion that “the check is located within the K hospital, i.e., e., e., e., re-s., re-s.e., re-s.s.e., re-s.s.e., s.s.e., re-s.s.e., s.s.s. s.s. s.s.s. s.s. 1) of the instant surgery.” On February 9, 2017, Plaintiff A received a statement of diagnosis from the L hospital, 2017, that Plaintiff A was unable to actively perform the right check.”